From suits to accessories, Joseph Wendt Custom Clothiers offers everything for men to dress in style from head to toe. This is a great infographic on men’s wardrobe essentials and how to build your wardrobe from the ground up.
It’s the height of the football season, so let’s take another quick trip into the world of the NFL. The last couple of times we were here we took a look at some of the more questionable design choices of the current NFL…
What about logos, though? Those contribute just as much to the overall “feel” of a team’s image as the uniform designs themselves do. The NFL is very good at logo continuity and integrity, especially compared to some other leagues.
But what about the logos that we almost got? The lost logos of the NFL, if you will? …Well, let’s just say there was a reason they were lost.
Seattle’s less-than-threatening mascot, a sea hawk, better known as an osprey, never lent itself well to logo design with its small head and ruffled feathers.
The Seahawks did their best with this slightly sleepy looking osprey head for many years, mostly relying on the strength of their great color scheme to get by.
Otherwise known as the exact same logo with a different helmet color. Well, not all of these are going to be that drastic, right? After all, NFL teams aren’t crazy. They wouldn’t go completely off the deep end, right?
…Okay, maybe they would. For many, many years, this has been the logo of the Colts, both in Baltimore and in Indianapolis.
For the 2001 Season, the team wanted something new, something exciting, something that just screamed “Indiana” and “Indianapolis” and “not hideous.” How could they go wrong, with one of the simplest, cleanest logos and color combos? They couldn’t possibly muck this one–
What the heck are we even looking at here?? The blue has gone purplish, the font design is lifted from a cereal box, and the horse head is some sort of terrifying, abstract Picasso-esque monstrosity! What were they thinking? Thankfully for everyone, the Colts didn’t go with this, instead choosing the following update:
New England Patriots
The Pats used to have a rather busy logo for their first few decades…
Oh, poor Jacksonville, here you are again. Before deciding on the Jaguar head for the logo in their inaugural 1995 Season, the Jags had an entire logo and uniform set all ready to go from 1993 to late 1994 featuring a very different Jaguar…
The Miami Dolphins started out with another AFL-staple clearly hand-drawn logo design, which they kept through the 1996 Season.
Uh… Well, if we’re talking airline livery… Circa 1981… Sure, good design. But for an NFL team? It looks like they swiped it from the dolphin enclosure at SeaWorld. The logo was outdated the moment it was designed, and accentuates the orange and aqua of the Dolphins logo over the much more prominent and well-known lily-white. The team scrapped it, opting instead to update its existing logo, making the titular dolphin more three-dimensional, well-defined…
This year, the team went back to the abstract, with a logo that… Looks more like the scrapped 1997 logo, actually.
The Bills logo has been the same since 1974. This familiar, sleek, and very functional design, that was actually rather ahead of its time in terms of logo design, looking for all the world like a logo from the late ’80s or early ’90s.
It’s probably for the best that they stuck with the old logo…
San Francisco 49ers
You may know this logo well, it or some slight variation on it has been the 49ers logo for basically forever.
Did you know that in 1991, the team changed it, even going so far as to make entirely new helmets, and introducing the new logo and helmets at a press conference before the 1991 Season? Why haven’t you ever heard of this?
Yeah, the Bay Area basically went insane, demanding it be changed back. The response was so overwhelmingly negative, the team did so just days later.
Oh, my, where to start? The Browns have never had a true logo, per se, always just being represented by their helmet, in one way…
And then a “B” in a football…
And then a… Dog face? Because of the “Dawg Pound,” whose name has nothing to do with the team name or colors or city, but is actually because of a really obscure story involving Hanford Dixon, a Browns cornerback in the 1980s?
Well. Whatever they actually flirted with as an official logo in 1965 can’t be any worse than those, right?
Yeesh. Go with the dog, guys. He’s much better.
As huge football fans, we here at Joseph’s Custom Clothiers excitedly watched yesterday’s Super Bowl XLVII. It turned out to be another great game, even with the half hour-long power outage! Congratulations are, of course, due to the Baltimore Ravens on their stunning win!
This 47th iteration of the Super Bowl marks a special point for the NFL. There has officially been a Super Bowl at the end of the majority of NFL seasons now. For 46 years, there was an NFL with no Super Bowl, something that’s almost impossible to think of now! After 47 years of the “Big Game,” it’s easy to take the over-the-top spectacle of the event for granted. It feels like there’s always been a Super Bowl, and that they’ve always been these huge meta events. Of course, that’s far from the truth. Last year, we posted a blog entry about the history of Super Bowl halftime shows, and how they went from Up With People and college marching bands to Madonna and Black Eyed Peas and massive pyrotechnic displays. But that’s just scratching the surface of the changes…
Going all the way back, the Super Bowl was created for a very specific reason: competition. From the NFL’s founding in 1920 up until the 1960s, there simply wasn’t another football league that could compete with the NFL’s total dominance of the sport in North America. Any league that tried was either shuttered, or absorbed into the NFL. But then along came the American Football League, or AFL, in 1960, who, instead of just trying to be another football league, tried new and unique rule changes and quirks to make themselves a legitimate companion league to the NFL. The NFL and the AFL clashed mightily for six years, before finally deciding that the endless battling for players and fans was just hurting both of their bottom lines, and that they would both be better served by merging. Combining the 16-team NFL with the 10-team AFL would take some time, though, and so a special championship game was created, to be played between the champions of both leagues, in order to get the public familiar with the idea of the two sets of teams competing directly until the actual merger in 1970.
The first Super Bowl was played at the end of the 1966 Season, between the NFL champion Green Bay Packers, and the AFL champion Kansas City Chiefs. It wasn’t known as the Super Bowl at first. It was officially the “First AFL-NFL World Championship Game.” That… Doesn’t really roll off the tongue.
But in a letter to NFL Commissioner Pete Rozelle, the Chiefs’ owner Lamar Hunt wrote, “I have kiddingly called it the ‘Super Bowl,’ which obviously can be improved upon.” The media, for obvious reasons, liked this name a lot better, and by the third game at the end of the 1968 Season, it had become official. Hilariously, Rozelle’s first choice for an official name was “The Big One.”
Over the years, the growth of the Super Bowl from a relatively minor, even ignored sports event to the multimedia juggernaut of today is truly staggering.
Super Bowls have gone from this…
Super Bowl cheerleaders have gone from this…
Bigger! Bolder! Louder! Everything about the game, from top to bottom, has grown in leaps and bounds over the years. The first Super Bowl couldn’t even sell out the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, with $12 tickets. Current tickets are usually well into the four-digit range for the nosebleeds, and are sold out far in advance.
In many ways, the Super Bowl’s gradual explosion in popularity can be attributed to two people. One was Bill Walsh, who popularized the West Coast Offense with the 49ers in the ’80s, and turned what was before a slower, more defensive-minded game into a much more fast-paced and exciting sport, which appealed far more to the masses. The other person was Joe Namath.
His famous “guarantee” that the Jets would defeat the overwhelmingly favored Colts in Super Bowl III brought enormous attention to the game on its own. The fact that he and the Jets actually pulled it off was so shocking, it completely changed the way people thought about the AFL teams, which became the core of the new AFC, and the way people thought of the Super Bowl. People started watching because of “Broadway” Joe.
Some quirks about the game that have coalesced over the years…
- Super Bowl Sunday, practically a national holiday in its own right, is the second biggest grilling day of the year after Independence Day.
- 1.23 billion chicken wings are consumed on Super Bowl Sunday.
- 49.2 million cases of beer are drunk on Super Bowl Sunday.
- Last year’s Super Bowl XLVI was not only the most watched Super Bowl of the 47, it was the most watched broadcast in US history, with approximately 111.3 million viewers. What’s more, of the top 10 rated broadcasts in US history, nine of them are Super Bowls (the tenth was the last episode of “M*A*S*H”).
- 30-second Super Bowl ads cost $3.8 million a piece this year.
- The Pittsburgh Steelers have the most Super Bowl wins, with 6, and are tied with the Dallas Cowboys for most appearances in a Super Bowl, with 8 each.
- The Pittsburgh Steelers versus the Dallas Cowboys is the most common Super Bowl matchup, having been the focus of three Super Bowls (X, XIII, XXX)
- The Buffalo Bills have the ignominious honor of having both the most consecutive appearances in a Super Bowl, with 4 (XXV, XXVI, XXVII, XXVIII), as well as being tied for the most Super Bowl losses, namely those 4 games. The Minnesota Vikings and New England Patriots have also lost 4 Super Bowls, but not in a row! The Bills also hold the record for committing the most turnovers in a Super Bowl, with 9 in Super Bowl XXVII.
- Joe Montana was named Super Bowl MVP more than anyone else, 3 out of his 4 Super Bowl appearances (XVI, XIX, XXIV).
- The Mercedes-Benz Superdome has hosted the Super Bowl more times than any other stadium, 7 times.
- The oldest person to play in a Super Bowl was Colts kicker Matt Stover in Super Bowl XLIV, who was 42 years, 11 days old at the time.
- The biggest blowout in super Bowl history was the 49ers’ 55-10 victory over the Broncos in Super Bowl XXIV.
- The closest game in Super Bowl history was the Giants’ 20-19 victory over the Bills in Super Bowl XXV.
- While teams have won back-to-back Super Bowls 8 times, no one has ever won 3-in-a-row.
- Only 4 of the NFL’s 32 teams have never been in a Super Bowl, the Cleveland Browns, the Detroit Lions, the Houston Texans and the Jacksonville Jaguars.
- No team has ever come back from being down by more than 10 points in a Super Bowl and won the game.
- The most points scored by in one Super Bowl was in Super Bowl XXIX, when the 49ers and Chargers scored 75 points combined.
- The most attended Super Bowl was the 103,985 attendance of Super Bowl XIV, thanks to the massive capacity of the Rose Bowl.
- There has never been a shutout in the Super Bowl.
- There has never been a Super Bowl that went into overtime.
- 14 of the league’s 32 teams have yet to win a Super Bowl.
- The home team alternates year-to-year between the two Conferences, with the AFC team being the home team in odd-numbered Super Bowls, and vice versa for the NFC team.
- No team has ever played the Super Bowl in its home stadium.
- The NFC team won every single Super Bowl from Super Bowl XIX to Super Bowl XXXI.
It’s time to return to the world of spies and vodka martinis, “shaken, not stirred.” And just in time, too, because today marks the North American release of the 23rd official James Bond film, “Skyfall.” We’ll be first in line to see it!
But before we head on an adventure with Daniel Craig’s Bond, it’s time to take a trip to the past, to where we left off in the James Bond fashion chronology, all the way back to 1962. The process of bringing James Bond to the screen from the page was not an easy one, to say the least. We won’t go into the details here, it would take far too long. But the lasing legacy of the long process was the choice of Sean Connery as James Bond.
As we told you last time, Bond in the novels was a sort of portmanteau of Ian Fleming himself crossed with his former buddies in British Intelligence circles. When Fleming imagined Bond, he basically imagined a more dapper version of himself.
The film’s producers at first didn’t stray too far from the idea, wanting Cary Grant for the role. Grant, though, refused to sign a multi-picture deal, and the producers were banking on a franchise. They went through British actor Richard Johnson, Patrick McGoohan and David Niven, never able to reach consensus. They even ran a contest to choose bond, eventually settling on a 28-year-old model named Peter Anthony, who was nowhere near prepared for the role. Legend has it they even considered future Bond Roger Moore, though he denies it.
Finally, a scruffy, 30-year-old Scotsman in unpressed clothes came in to try out for the part, and absolutely oozed a macho, devil-may-care attitude. He didn’t look like the novel’s description, but he felt like the character, through-and-through. The producers knew on the spot that Sean Connery was their man.
There was, however, a problem. He had zero fashion sense, and was as sophisticated and cultured as a dump truck. Director Terence Young, himself a suave and debonair playboy of the highest order, took Connery under his wing, introducing him to the high life and high fashion of London. He took him to his own personal tailor, Anthony Sinclair, at 43 Conduit Street. The paired-down look of the suits Connery ended up wearing throughout his time as Bond became known as the “Conduit cut”: lightweight 100% wool in navy blue and shades of grey with a subtle check, “waisted” in a slimline, single-breasted, two-button format. The idea was for Bond to look well-dressed, but not stand out in a crowd, sound advice for a spy.
Connery had never worn a suit for any length of time before, and was apparently insanely uncomfortable in one. So Young had Connery wear the suits CONSTANTLY, all day, every day, during pre-production, until they felt like a second skin to him.
For all intents and purposes, Young turned Connery into a more gruff (and Scottish) version of himself, rather than of Fleming. This act has influenced the way Bond has been portrayed ever since, with tongue planted firmly in cheek, dark with a dash of humor, as opposed to the more brutal, cold-hearted version of the character from the books (although that’s come back a bit…more on that later). Bond became a fashion icon in his own right, now that his internal monologue was missing. Instead of commenting on what other people were wearing, he dressed to the nines himself, but then, so did his adversaries and allies.
In the first of Connery’s Bond films, 1962’s “Dr. No,” Bond informs CIA agent Felix Leiter that his suits were tailored in Savile Row, even though they were not, a slight nod to the books and to Fleming. The fashion in the first two films, “Dr. No” and 1963’s “From Russia With Love,” retains the basic look that Young gave Connery, all designed by Sinclair, and all accompanied by shirts from Turnbull & Asser.
The suits are remarkably simple, and, in fact, Bond never even dons a belt, so as to keep the sleek lines of the suits uninterrupted. The pants all sit at the waits, not the hip, another way to keep the lines more unified. Bond wears, almost exclusively, dark blue grenadine ties for the entire films. He frequently wears a white linen pocket square, neatly folded into the front of his jackets. And, hilariously, despite Bond’s hatred of Windsor knots, he wears them in “Dr. No,” before properly shifting to four-in-hand knots from “From Russia With Love” on.
Interestingly, the suits in the first two films are more timeless than suits in the films that followed. They could all be easily worn today. The next three films, 1964’s “Goldfinger,” 1965’s “Thunderball” and 1967’s “You Only Live Twice,” all featured far narrower lapels, muted browns, and old-fashioned three-piece cuts, all very, very ’60s, though we do mean that in a good way.
Rumor has it that some American tailors were used in “Goldfinger,” which makes sense, since more fashionable (for the time) details like pageboy waistcoats suddenly show up. The number of materials and colors also expands dramatically. But the basic cut remains the same, until the next film in the series, 1969’s “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service.”
OHMSS brought in not just new fashion, but a new Bond, in the form of Australian model George Lazenby, after Sean Connery declined to return for a sixth, extra contractual film. Peter Hunt, director of OHMSS, was a fashion-conscious gentleman in his own right, and was given broad leeway in the way this new Bond would be presented, using his own favorite tailor, Dimi Major of Fulham, London W1. Possibly because of Lazenby’s more “pretty” look, and experience as a model, as well as acknowledgement of the more brazen and colorful styles that had come to dominate fashion in the seven years since “Dr. No,” Bond was given a much larger and more colorful wardrobe. A modified version of the “Conduit cut” from prior films was still used in the London scenes, but unlike before, Bond wore more than that sleek, simple cut when out of the glare of MI6, even wearing an astonishing cream-colored suit at one point. Did we mention the ruffles?
But come 1971, Connery came back for one more Bond, “Diamonds Are Forever.” The film is a bit of a wacky outlier for the Bond series, and even though Connery brought the more muted styles and colors of his films back with him (likely along with tailor Anthony Sinclair), some of the OHMSS style remained, likely a result of the American side of the production not collaborating with the English side completely. Connery even wears a cream-colored suit himself, at one point. And even the muted, London suits are slightly changed, with the wider lapels of the ’70s making their appearance felt.
This brings us to the end of Connery’s tenure, until his brief return with the unofficial “Never Say Never Again” in 1983. Roger Moore and excesses of the ’70s are next, and we’ll pick up there in Part 3. Until next time…
Let’s go off topic, and talk sports! In case it wasn’t extremely obvious, we’re big football fans around these parts. Being based in the New York area, location of NFL Headquarters, and within 200 miles of 6 different NFL teams’ stadiums, we’re right in the middle of the action every season. The only way we could be in a more football-centric location would be if we opened a showroom inside the Football Hall of Fame in Canton, Ohio! And, of course, as we have made no secret, we’ve made suits for many current and previous NFL players and personalities, and we have pals at every level of American Football.
So, yes, we watch a lot of football, and we get invested in the insanely complicated rules, the crazy draft and trade processes, injury reports, logo designs, Super Bowl host city debates, all of it. But the one subject that has always fascinated us, and has inspired some moments of truly intense passion/hate, is the relocation of teams, and the expansion of the NFL through new teams.
The NFL is, without a doubt, one of the stablest sports leagues in history. That might have something to do with all of those “record profits” we keep hearing about. The NFL hasn’t contracted, that is to say, shuttered a team, since 1952. The other three major sports leagues in North America have all come close in the interim, and none of them expanded at anywhere near the speed, or with the success, that the NFL did. This stability extends to relocation, too. When a team moves to a new city, it’s almost always an extremely acrimonious affair that utterly breaks the hearts of the city being abandoned. Multiple NBA, NHL and MLB teams have all relocated in the past few years, while the last NFL relocation was in 1997, with only another four going back to the NFL-AFL merger in 1970 (six if you count the Raiders leaving Oakland and then coming back). Relocation is serious business for the League, and expanding into a new market is always a risky affair, threatening to dilute the talent of the player base nationally.
However, there are some glaring gaps in the current NFL map, and the NFL’s incredible stability means it very well could handle another expansion or two in the near future. To that end, let’s prognosticate, and look at where teams might be added, what teams are in danger of leaving and to where, and what teams actually started somewhere else (some of these are VERY surprising).
WHO’S FROM WHERE?
You hear the words “Chicago Bears” and it sounds downright eternal. Meanwhile, say the word “Oilers” to someone under 25, and they’ll likely stare at you blankly. Most of the older, legacy teams in the NFL started out somewhere else than where they are now. In some cases, even their team name changed! And yes, some of you reading this are nodding your heads sagely, saying, “OF COURSE I know the Rams were originally from Los Angeles.” Yes, they were. By way of Cleveland. Like we said, there’s been a lot of moving over the years. Ignoring all of the old, small market teams that defined the early NFL and mostly closed up shop (the Packers are the only one of these left with the same name and city as back then), let’s go over who’s actually who here.
- The Chicago Bears were the Chicago Staleys were the Decatur Staleys (what the heck is a “Staley”?)
- The Arizona Cardinals were the Phoenix Cardinals were the St. Louis Cardinals were the Chicago Cardinals
- The San Diego Chargers were the Los Angeles Chargers (yes, L.A. lost even more teams over the years)
- The Kansas City Chiefs were the Dallas Texans
- The Indianapolis Colts were the Baltimore Colts (do not mention the name “Irsay” within 50 miles of Baltimore if you value your life)
- The Detroit Lions were the Portsmouth Spartans
- The New England Patriots were the Boston Patriots
- The Oakland Raiders were the Los Angeles Raiders were the Oakland Raiders (we swear Al Davis was just messing with the League here)
- The St. Louis Rams were the Los Angeles Rams were the Cleveland Rams
- The Baltimore Ravens were the Cleveland Browns… Sort of (do not mention the name “Modell” within 50 miles of Cleveland if you value your life)
- The Washington Redskins were the Boston Redskins were the Boston Braves
- The Tennessee Titans were the Tennessee Oilers were the Houston Oilers
And, just to make your head spin more, the New York Jets began life as the New York Titans, and the Pittsburgh Steelers started out as the Pittsburgh Pirates. And we haven’t even mentioned the plethora of now defunct teams from back in the day!
WHO’S GOING WHERE?
Now, on to the meat and potatoes. What teams are in danger of leaving, and where might they go?
Buffalo has lost huge portions of its population over the years, just like the rest of the Rust Belt. But combine that with Buffalo’s poor economy and intense, agonizingly painful football history (even the Cigarette Smoking Man plots against them), and you have problems. The Buffalo fan base is dedicated, though, even with four years of Super Bowl hell. But the team is not profitable. Seats at Ralph Wilson Stadium are the cheapest tickets in the league, and the merchandise is among the poorest-selling. But the biggest issue here is that the owner, Ralph Wilson, is 93. And though he has no intention of moving the team, when he’s gone, the next owner likely won’t feel the same way.
Where might they go?
Believe it or not, The Great White North. As the only major North American league in just one country, the NFL desperately wants to expand into Canada, CFL or no, and they’ve been testing the waters by having the Bills play a Regular Season game in Toronto yearly, soon to be two games. And Toronto is a good sports town, as well as the fifth largest city in North America. The writing is on the wall here.
The NFL may have made a mistake when they awarded one of the two new 1995 expansion teams to Jacksonville. Jacksonville is a big city only on paper, with most of the metro population spread across a huge, mostly rural area. Meanwhile, Florida already has two other NFL teams with built-in fan bases, and North Florida is far more interested in college football, like the rest of the Deep South, than the mostly Northern-transplant-populated South Florida. Add in seventeen years of near-futility, and you end up with a partly empty stadium for every game, resulting in local blackouts, where people in Jacksonville can’t even watch their own team!
Where might they go?
The second biggest American city without an NFL franchise, San Antonio has been on the NFL’s radar for some time. After Katrina made the Saints temporarily vulnerable, a definite effort was made by the city to lure the team from New Orleans. Texas is football-crazy as a rule, and has more than enough people to support three teams.
Al Davis’ death has made an already tenuous situation more unstable. The Raiders now play in the second oldest stadium in the league (after the storied Lambeau Field), share a media market with a more popular team (the 49ers), and have years of bad blood with the city government in Oakland. Davis, infamous curmudgeon that he was, made no secret of mulling over departing Oakland for greener pastures, just as he did for the exact same reasons in 1980 and 1981, before he took off for Los Angeles in 1982.
Where might they go?
Wait, what? Really? BACK to Los Angeles? After going BACK to Oakland FROM Los Angeles? Good God, Al Davis is flipping off the League from beyond the grave!
All kidding aside, L.A. has been without a team since 1995, when BOTH of its teams split at the same time. Los Angeles is the second biggest city and media market in the United States, third biggest on the continent. You’d think this would be a no-brainer, but the League has been dragging its heels for years. The more cynical amongst us have suggested this is deliberate, in order to use L.A. as a club with which to frighten cities into ponying up for new stadiums and facilities, lest their team bolt for L.A. The less cynical opinion is that A, there’s no stadium of sufficient size and modernity in the area, and B, the NFL wasn’t exactly a slam dunk last time. L.A. is not a sports town, it’s an entertainment town, and the teams that succeed there, like the Dodgers and Lakers, understand that, and use it. The NFL didn’t. But this is a much richer, flashier NFL than back then, and they’d be fools to pass up such a gigantic market. And there is a solid stadium proposal with backing from the City of Los Angeles on the table. Stay tuned.
St. Louis Rams
The Rams have been having a terrible few years. Bad season after bad season. Losing their longtime owner and hometown girl, Georgia Frontiere. Winding up in a new, but poorly designed and perpetually dark stadium. Being based in another one of those drying up Rust Belt cities, this one best known for its rampant crime problems. Rumbles that they’d leave St. Louis have been circulating for a while now, especially as fan support erodes. Quite a sad state for what was briefly “The Greatest Show on Turf.”
Where might they go?
Oh, come on, really? Them too? What, did the Rams and Raiders just want to make L.A. jealous?
Honorable (dishonorable?) mentions go to the Minnesota Vikings and the San Diego Chargers. The Vikings have been struggling with a stadium on the verge of falling apart, and if the state refuses to build a new one, there could be a relocation in their future, but we really don’t see the NFL allowing one of its popular “old guard” franchises to end up somewhere else. But then, we thought the same thing about the “old” Browns. As for the Chargers, they too suffer from placement in one of the oldest and most decrepit stadiums in the League. And, just like in Minnesota, it all depends on the government building a new one. But also like the Vikings, we’d be shocked if they actually moved.
WHO’S GETTING A NEW TEAM?
First of all, as we said, expansion is unlikely in the near future, but possible. There are quite a few markets the NFL wants to be in, and we highly doubt that all four of the teams above will move. Los Angeles, San Antonio and Toronto all want teams. The League wants them to have teams. But who else could support a brand new franchise? And there’s a definite limit here on the number of new teams that could be created: too many would dilute football talent, and the League is loathe to ruin its perfect 4x4x4x4 Conference structure. But if they did go ahead with it, these are the most obvious choices, discounting the ones above.
Columbus: Could Ohio support three teams? Probably not, but Columbus is exploding, and has a fantastic sports tradition, albeit at the collegiate level.
Las Vegas: The largest city in America without a single “major league” sports team, Las Vegas is ripe for expansion, but its recent housing market collapse and population of mostly transplants does not a solid fan base make.
London: No, we aren’t crazy, the NFL itself has suggested this madhouse of an idea. The International Series played yearly at Wembley Stadium seems to be just for the purpose of testing the concept, and the Londoners have been very receptive. The biggest city in Europe, full of loyal, sports-crazed fans? Perfect! …Except for the logistical nightmares involved. How on Earth would, for instance, the 49ers deal with a road game eight hours ahead, with a ten-hour flight in each direction? And while the British love one game a year, would they REALLY support sixteen?
Oklahoma City: Another exploding Sun Belt city, OKC has been bit by the sports bug of late, with the NBA’s Thunder moving into town from Seattle a few years ago. The support seems to be there, but the city is close (in Plains State terms) to Dallas, and Oklahoma is a state dominated by high school and college football. Time will tell here.
So, there you have it, the past, present and future of the NFL in one neat package. Now… Where’s our snazzy futuresports? Come on, people, it’s 2012! Where’s our Rollerball? Our Velocity? The gigantic Laser Tag arenas those commercials in the ’80s promised us?
During the festivities of Super Bowl Week, we could not help but think about old and sometime current NFL (and AFL) uniforms. Some more than others because, well, aesthetically speaking, they did NOT make the cut, and we are enormously happy that we don’t have to look at all of them every Sunday (well, except when some smarty pants thinks it’s a clever idea for a throwback week, which they often do). In any case, we could not help but play a little fashion police with them. Here are the worst offenders!
These are classic pieces. Completely trend-free, definitely part of your sartorial foundation. But why are they so frowned upon? We are talking about whites, beiges and that entire neutral spectrum on the lighter side.
So, the next time you think of these lighter shades of neutrals as plain and boring or too complicated, think again. You might be just experiencing a lot of creativity. Neutrals are to a sartorial guy what a white canvas is for a painter. Are they complicated? No way, neutrals are the easiest way, not just to put together, but to acquire that super chic look all year-round. If you’re still not convinced, think of those bright colors and hard-to-do accessories, which is exactly what neutrals are for.
Can you think of a style icon that is known for wearing loads of color? If you were told to go to your closet and assemble your coolest outfit, would it be colorful? Is “effortless” the reason why we love it? Dress in shades of neutrals. It may not be a dynamic look, but it is sophisticated.
Start by mixing your neutrals: for example, the darker ones with the lighter ones and then move up to different shades of one color, then, finally, add texture to that mix. Hopefully by summer, you’ll be ready for that super stylish white suit.
Don’t be afraid, here are some good tips on wearing neutrals.
Keep your whites spotless and in good condition (skip the trip to the dry cleaners when possible, this just adds to the yellowish look and obviously shortens the life of your garment). We prefer hand washing.
If you’re wearing more than one item that’s the same color, make sure they are either exactly the same color, or clearly different shades of the same color. Nearly the same but not quite is not a good look, as it looks like you’ve tried to match exactly and failed.
Since neutrals are soft and easy on the eyes, all-neutral ensembles can read a bit bland. A great way to spice ‘em up is to add a variety of textures: leather, wool, tweed, rough linen, smooth cotton. Pieces with pick-stitching and other 3D detailing also add textural interest.
And finally, it can be messy out there. This is magical and worth keeping in your bag at all times: a Tide pen!